Jump to content

0TreeLemur

Supporter
  • Posts

    3,005
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

0TreeLemur last won the day on February 27 2021

0TreeLemur had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About 0TreeLemur

  • Birthday September 1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    : USA
  • Interests
    Airplanes & things that make them go. Brittain technology.

  • Model
    '83 M20J
  • Base
    Sweet Home Alabama

Recent Profile Visitors

10,479 profile views

0TreeLemur's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Year In
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

2.2k

Reputation

  1. I think Lasar sells them ($$). Alternatively, there are CAD files floating around and you can have one cut for you by a company that does contract water jet cutting. That's what I did years ago.
  2. I know! If you look at his course on the USGS page, he was blown off course after departing Alaska, or was taking advantage of favorable winds! I read that the solar powered GPS and satellite transmitter they glued to its tail feathers weighed 5 grams. He carried that too!
  3. You can report it here: https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/wildlife The bird won't get a phone number to call.
  4. Just when I was thinkin' that our petroleum powered flying machines are the pinnacle of aviation, this article gave me a reason to reconsider. It describes a satellite-logged flight of a 5-month old Bar-Tailed Godwit in Oct. 2022. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-feathers-are-one-of-evolutions-cleverest-inventions The bird was tagged as a juvenile in Alaska. Flight path shown here: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/alaska-science-center/news/juvenile-bar-tailed-godwit-b6-sets-world-record Wow!
  5. Back when we had our C model, during an owner-assisted annual where I took off all the underwing inspection plates, I found a nest and a corpse in that vicinity inside the wing with a scope. Also true that once they get in the wing, they have free run of the aircraft. I've found no sign that they've taken up residence in my plane. I think it was my fault and hopefully a one-off. Like @LANCECASPER, while I did not leave a cheese-n-crackers pack in my airplane, I left a single used honey-lemon flavored Rogue pouch. Apparently that was irresistible . The little vandal left the wrapper on the co-pilot's seat in shreds, with a few droppings but luckily did not chew on the seat or anything else that I saw.
  6. The setup in my C involved a Mid-continent GI-106A connected to the GNS430W, and a BK KI-209 connected to the KX-155 nav/com. The analog outputs from those two indicators were connected to the Accutrak II as NAV1 and NAV2. I almost never used the VOR nav functions. I'd say you can get by with just the GI-106A connected to the Accutrak.
  7. I opened up the tail and looked around today. No signs of entry, forced or otherwise. As per @FlyingDude, I'm guessing up the nose gear and into the belly by way of some magical acrobatics.
  8. How do they get in through the tail? It's in a hangar, not tied down.
  9. In the category of "it's always something...." Yesterday I went to the hangar. When I opened the door to our J I was greeted by a surprise on the right-front seat. A little mess of paper shreds and mouse poop. It seems the last time I flew I left something behind that a mouse thought was tasty. Both the cabin and baggage doors were closed and locked. Cowl flaps were closed. This happened since Monday. I've been in this hangar for six years, first time I've seen mouse turds in the cabin of my airplane. Got on a creeper and inspected the rodent socks in the main wheel wells. No deficiencies noted. Ain't nothing bigger than an ant getting in that way. Crept under the nose gear wheel well. There are some openings but they don't seem a likely entry pathway because they would be awfully difficult for a mouse to get to unless they jumped. Anybody have an idea how they entered the cabin? I removed everything and didn't see widespread signs of occupancy. I don't think that they've moved in (yet). I've seen that some folks put down rodent rings around the three wheels to impede entry. I might start doing that. Can anyone recommend a source for those? Thx. Fred
  10. A link to another thread discussing this very issue. Highly recommend folks read what @whiskytango wrote.
  11. Several items that I've sold or wanted to buy in the last year have attract scammers. I love them. I like to mess with them. Sadly my "WTB Turbo Encabulator" ad didn't generate any offers. "My dad has one, send money to prince@nigeria.net"
  12. Most excellent outcome. I've driven that stretch of highway many times. At about 3:00 on a Sunday afternoon it should not be too crowded. However, in the news video you can see an overhead power line across the road right where the airplane is parked. As @whiskytango's experience has shown us, they can cause an easy emergency landing to become a difficult emergency landing. There are lots of good fields to land in around there. Many.
  13. I fly 1000 mile cross-countries several times a year. At first did it all in my C by hand. Arrived at my destination too tired. Then like you I gathered the parts and installed an Accutrak II first in our C. It was a fantastic magenta line follower. But, after I finished my IR and started asking for diversions around buildups I started to covet the Accuflite. Installed that my nav problems were all solved. Life was so good, except for altitude hold. Next I pieced together the parts for the Brittain AH system, and with the help of some resident knowledge here, got it working. Ended up with a full two-axis autopilot, all done by tubing and rubber bands! Now I fly a J with a "modern" autopilot- the 1980's vintage Bendix-King KFC-150. Honestly, the Brittain wing leveler does a better job than the BK at keeping the wings level in turbulence because it is more responsive and smoother. The dynamics of the Brittain wing leveler are just unbeatable it seems. The altitude hold on the BK system is very aggressive at maintaining altitude within 20 ft. The Brittain altitude hold had more like a +/- 60 ft variance, and provided a much smoother ride. In mountain wave turbulence I just have to turn the BK altitude hold off or it will make my passengers (or me) puke. The Brittain altitude hold, while responsive, seems a better match for the flight dynamics of a small airplane. The Accutrak II would sometimes wander a bit. Seemed random, but more likely to happen after several hours of a long trip. The Accuflite of course depends on the rate of gyro precession on your DG- that would make long distance flights without the Accutrak a little zig-zaggy. If you can find all the parts, I'd recommend putting in both. You can use the Accuflite to help in maneuvering (e.g. holds) too if you need to look at an approach plate or weather data on your iPad while shooting an approach. It's all great for workload reduction.
  14. I got the following info- From Honeywell data sheet: Catalog Listing 21SX39-T (MS24547-1) Mil Spec.: MIL-PRF-8805 Max. Op. Temp: 82°C [180°F] Electrical data and UL Codes: 7 A Note: it says that Prefix 21SX is the same as a Prefix 1SX with MIL-approvals They are a single-pole, double throw switch. Normally, pins 1 and 3 are connected together and pin 2 is open. When depressed, pins 1 and 2 are connected and pin 3 is open.
  15. I've got a business trip coming up in late May in SLC. I see a good opportunity for a nice long XC in my Mooney with a stop to see my son in Los Alamos. I'm looking for a recommendation of a good field to land and tie down for four days from someone with experience in SLC.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.