Jump to content

gsxrpilot

Basic Member
  • Posts

    9,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    315

Posts posted by gsxrpilot

  1. Its important not to get off on the wrong foot with your A&P. There aren't a surplus of good ones and they're all over booked. So get the relationship started right. 

    IMO the easiest way to start off wrong, is to start with an annual. Rather, start with an oil change. Start the relationship off with small well defined jobs. That way the +/- or the over/under is measured in Ben Franklin's and not in AMU's

    Once you get to know each other... assuming all is still trending in the right direction, handing the bird over for an annual is like consummating the relationship.

    • Like 2
  2. I'll bet it's just pads. If the pads are gone down to the metal, the piston will push out too far and dump fluid. I flew mine to Texas that way as it was on it's way to annual. JD showed me the pads, rivets, and half the backing plates all ground down. 

    It was all going in the bin anyway and new to me, Ovation double puck brakes going on.

    • Like 3
  3. JD and Laura (and Jeremiah) at SWTA have become close personal friends over the course of the five or so years they've been maintaining my Mooneys. It doesn't happen immediately, and it's definitely a two way street. But it is by far, the single most important and confidence inspiring part of airplane ownership. I don't think I could own an airplane without this level of support.

    • Like 3
  4. 11 hours ago, Skates97 said:

    Yes, no problems at all with them. The first one I bought was on a lightning deal with Amazon and I think was $80 so I thought what the heck, I've thrown that much money at stuff that didn't work before, why not give it a try. Even at $100 it's not a bad deal to try out, the jump to the 4K at $250 is more than I would want to roll the dice on. From what I have read unless you are planning to put it on a big screen TV the 4K isn't noticeable. Even watching the videos from the Ghost X on my 75" TV they are crisp and look good. I'm sure if I watched the 1080p side by side with 4K I could tell, but for what I'm doing I'm very happy.

    Thanks. And love the video and the blog by the way. Always good stuff.

    • Thanks 1
  5. 12 hours ago, F1WAH said:

    I’m based out of ARB, fly a 172 (N8541U in K row of NW T’s), have a lead on a M20F and am going through the 182 v Mooney analysis. Never flown in a Mooney. If willing would like to meet up and get your opinion. 

    You need to go fly in one. 

    • Like 1
  6. Not much to add beyond what's already been said. I never thought an audio panel would make much difference in the cockpit. After all, the audio quality is a function of headsets, or so I thought. Then on a whim and a Black Friday sale at @Avionics Source, I bought a PMA450a and later traded it for a PMA450b. It is the single biggest improvement in my cockpit. 

    Not only is it a top quality unit, but it's nice to know I can ask for service and get it, if needed. Garmin makes good stuff, but they won't give you same level of support at @jcovington describes above. They'll tell you to take it back to your installer. For those of us who are pretty good with our hands and somewhat technically savvy, being able to talk with the guys who build the kit, is a game changer. I had a GMA340 prior and did the swap myself. It took longer to open the box than it did to switch out the units.

    Just some of the things I like:

    • Noise suppression is amazing. In my all electric airplane and two alternators, the PMA450 just took all the electronic noise away.
    • Music distribution and selective muting makes it my wife's favorite cockpit tech. Easier to get funding that way as well.
    • Bluetooth works and works perfectly. I took a call on my phone once while on the take off roll, full power. The guy I was talking to thought I was sitting in my office at home.
    • IntelliAudio - I'm always either on flight following or IFR. There's no need to ask to step away to get weather, or flight service. Its easy to listen to two channels at the same time.

    @Avionics Source just made it too easy to buy, and @Mscheuer made it too easy to install and use. What's not to like?

    • Like 5
    • Haha 1
  7. 2 hours ago, Skates97 said:

    I don't have the Drift 4K but have used the Drift Ghost X and been impressed with it. I get 4+ hours of battery life out of it. This is a video from it mounted under the wing. Skip ahead to about 30 minutes for some nice footage of the lights from container ships coming up through the marine layer. A bonus is that the N-Flight Cam cable that is for the GoPro Hero 3 will also work with the Drift Ghost X to pick up the radio/intercom on a recording. I did a write up a couple months ago in The Mooney Flyer about the different cameras I have used and the mounts. You can make a good underwing mount that goes on the tie-down for about $15.

    https://themooneyflyer.com/issues/2021-AprTMF.pdf - Look at the "Cameras, Mounts, and Cables Article

     

    Yep, I read the article and watched the video, all before I went to look at the cameras. And I was about to buy when I started reading the reviews. But it's good to hear you're not having any issues with the Drift. Maybe I should get the Ghost X for a lot less money and try it out.

  8. I'm super interested in this topic. I've only ever used GoPro cameras to date. And I've used a lot of them. 

    I was just looking at the Drift cameras, but their Amazon reviews are not good. I'd love to order a Drift 4K but just a little hesitant at the moment.

  9. The narrowest part of the Rockies is further north. But regardless, it' pretty easy to follow the roads through the mountains. 

    If you're sight seeing along the route, KRAP is good for Mount Rushmore, then fly by Devils Tower in Wyoming. Going from there to KWYS is a good way to see Yellowstone from the air. The Grand Prismatic never disappoints. WYS is 6650 MSL but with plenty of room. I took off out of there at max gross in July. Just plan to take off in the morning when it's cool, and there is plenty of room to circle over the field until you're at a comfortable altitude. It's a short flight from there to KGPI. And you can stay over wide valleys the whole way.

    With just a little bit of route planning and good weather, your Mooney is just fine for flying through the mountains to the west. And nice days are the norm in the summertime.

    • Like 1
  10. Just now, flyboy0681 said:

    I announced my retirement and will be calling it quits in March. A trans-con trip in the J is the first bucket list item and my wife and I plan to take three to four weeks, making many stops along the way. My plan calls for a southern route to California, then up the coast to Seattle and eastbound through the Rockies on the way to Maine.

    Given this itinerary, what is the ideal time of year to go?

    Different parts of the trip are better at different times of year. But coming through the Rockies, summer would be better. But if doing the section from San Antonio to LA in the summer, go early in the mornings. You don't want to be anywhere over West Texas, New Mexico, or Arizona after about noon in the summer. 

    I know Denver isn't on the route of a circumnavigation of the lower 48, but if you do come through the central Rockies, maybe to land in Leadville... the beer's on me.

  11. 27 minutes ago, BenLaw said:

    Thanks all,

    I appreciate your thoughts, and now I know more of what "I don't know" than before. So I think I will wait a year before getting the Mooney and just concentrate on getting a license for now. But I will still put my name down on the 3-5 year waiting list for an open hangar!

    cheers,

    Ben

    Many of us who have hangars, got them before the airplane. A hangar is a lot harder to find than the airplane.

    • Like 1
  12. 1 hour ago, toto said:

    An option to consider is getting up early and doing your "night" takeoffs shortly before dawn. If you leave early and return late, you could get your currency over three weekends and six flights without having to do a single "currency" flight. 

    I did this to satisfy my Commercial, 2 hour day/night cross country requirements. My brother and I took off at 3:30 am and flew 2 hours to breakfast (night cross country). Then flew home (day cross country).

    • Like 1
    1. Never
    2. No
    3. No

    With your turbo, altitude doesn't play into the equation. Or at least not for this conversation. Use lean find to discover the correct fuel flow for a given MP that puts you where you want to be LOP. Make note of those numbers. For me in my 252 a typical LOP setting was 25"/9.5gph. Once you know the numbers for your engine, you can skip the Lean Find feature and just go to those numbers. And if during a long flight, you notice the MP change or the FF change, just put it back. No need to run lean find.

    • Like 6
  13. 2 hours ago, David Lloyd said:

    One factor no has mentioned is how close the parallel runways are to each other.  What, about 1000'? 1500'?  Back when CLT began IFR operations to parallel runways, there was a lot of discussion and procedures put in place.  36L (now C due to the 3rd runway added) and 36R are about 4000' apart.  1000' Leaves little margin for error.

    It's not just the 1000' between them that provides separation. The thresholds are 2000' apart as well. 

    And in a very busy metro airspace, with lots of Deltas close to each other and various Bravo shelf's hanging over everything, two stadium TFR's, and rising terrain very close by, you don't launch into the sky here in the Denver area without knowing where you are and where you are supposed to be, at all times. 

    There's no excuse for the Cirrus pilot in this environment.

    • Like 2
  14. 5 hours ago, will1874 said:

    As I continue towards my first airplane purchase, I have decided that the single item I will not do without is a digital engine monitor.  Let's say the airplane I buy is within 200 hours of TBO.  Should I install the engine monitor, watch how it performs, and wait to overhaul on condition / performance? Or, just overhaul and install the engine monitor at the same time? 

    I like your way of thinking.

    The engine monitor will certainly give you more information than not having an engine monitor.  I would separate the two decisions. Go ahead and install the engine monitor. And I don't think the engine on or off makes any difference. Get a Primary engine monitor and then remove the factory gauges. The two sets of gauges will never agree and you'll always wonder which is correct. So go with a Primary engine monitor so you can get rid of the original gauges.

    Now that that's done... decide what to do about the engine. If it's running well, has good compressions, and isn't using too much oil, just keep flying it. Be sure to open an account on SavvyAnalysis and log the data from the engine monitor.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.